Process
Accessibility audit methodology built for evidence and follow-through
Every engagement is structured to help teams understand scope, validate risk, and move findings into implementation without ambiguity.
Key steps
From scoping to closure evidence
Each stage is designed to improve decision quality for compliance, product, design, engineering, and QA stakeholders.
- 01
Discovery and scope definition
Evidence is captured against the agreed benchmark, then translated into clear remediation actions and risk-aware priorities.
- 02
Benchmark alignment
Evidence is captured against the agreed benchmark, then translated into clear remediation actions and risk-aware priorities.
- 03
Automated baseline scan
Evidence is captured against the agreed benchmark, then translated into clear remediation actions and risk-aware priorities.
- 04
Manual expert review
Evidence is captured against the agreed benchmark, then translated into clear remediation actions and risk-aware priorities.
- 05
Keyboard-only testing
Evidence is captured against the agreed benchmark, then translated into clear remediation actions and risk-aware priorities.
- 06
Screen-reader testing
Evidence is captured against the agreed benchmark, then translated into clear remediation actions and risk-aware priorities.
- 07
Critical journey validation
Evidence is captured against the agreed benchmark, then translated into clear remediation actions and risk-aware priorities.
This process is typically applied across website accessibility audits, standards-mapped compliance reviews, and engagements that require a decision-ready audit report.
Engagement
Request a scoped accessibility audit
Share the product, standards, and timelines in scope. IAAP Audit will outline an evidence-led review approach with practical next steps.